Ancient Romes Animal Cruelty for Entertainment :: essays research papers

The Romans are often characterized as loving untrained and cruel entertainment in the amphitheatre. It has been suggested that the games served the dual purpose of providing entertainment for the multitude and maintaining the political status quo.In todays society, the killing of cosmos and animals usually means a jail term, and seeing someone miscarry is not something people go and see for fun. Violence was glorified in Rome hundreds of years ago. All the crimes they committed were condoned, accepted and glorified. There were quartet different genres of such entertainment in the games held in amphitheatres (Amphi-theatres are out-of-door spheres. "theatres in the round" Amphi- meaning "round" in Greek.) Gladiatorial combat, the delegacy execution of foreigners, beast shows, as hygienic as chariot racing. watch someone or a beast kill an another(prenominal) was applauded for the method, skill, or artistry used in the slaughter. The games themselves provided ways for Rome to demonstrate the motive of their empire, as huge investments of wealth, time, and emotion was put into the games. Death became a spectator pump sport with the viewers and the viewed both contributing to a wild and unskillful performance. Already by the late Republic magistrates were spending huge amounts of bills on these games. The Latin word for gladiatorial games is Munus which means obligatory offering. This reflects the caudex of these games as funerary offerings to the dead. While magistrates in the Republic may well have put on games to gain usual favour, this was in their secluded capacity and not as magistrates. Only gradually did the gladiatorial shows perform to be assimilated with the games put on by magistrates. While the most popular games were chariot racing and simulated naval battles, fights in the amphitheatres, shown in these mosaics include gladiator V gladiator, gladiator V animal (pic 2) and animal V animal, were a jet feature. Less co mmon, but not infrequent was the release of wild beasts from the pits into the arena where hundreds of criminals had earlier been positioned. These spectacles all deeming to be very entertaining to spectators. passim the history of the Republic, in that respect was a difference between the gladiatorial contests and other forms of spectacular entertainment. The Romans did not invent the concept of gladiatorial fighting there is some uncertainty as to the exact reference. One ancient source says it was the Etruscans, a non-Indo-European people who lived directly north of the Romans.